Records needed for this question
Dataset labels, environment identifiers and report source definitions.
How to investigate
Verify that production reports exclude demo records and that examples retain their synthetic label.
An illustrative review decision
Use an explicit source label that survives export and aggregation. A demo row should remain identifiable after it leaves the demonstration screen, and production reporting should have a verifiable exclusion rule.
What can lead to the wrong conclusion?
A realistic demonstration total is not a customer result or a confirmed saving.
The result to retain
A source-separation check with no invented production evidence.
Apply the review in context
Technology Spend currently provides an evidence-first demo workspace with synthetic demonstration records. Production sources, tenant integrations and external actions remain disabled until explicitly connected and validated. Keep identified, reviewed, approved, implemented and confirmed savings distinct. Capability overlap is a review signal, not an automatic removal recommendation. Production evidence must remain separate from synthetic/demo records.
This guide describes a human review method, not a claim that every scenario is automatically detected or executed. Explore AuditRes Technology Spend.